Concerned Constituents of Canada

Do not consent. Do not comply. Do not obey.

Do not consent.
Do not comply.
Do not obey.

Exposing the Assumptions

Before you is the most definitive account to date of irrefutable scientific evidence submitted in a court challenge to the COVID-19 lockdowns and related emergency measures. By law in Ontario and Canada, as well as under United States federal law, the existence of reasonable alternatives to emergency measures necessarily renders such measures invalid, inoperable, and illegal.

Yet, to date, no one has effectively challenged the narrative that COVID-19 is one of the deadliest pandemics in human history; that it can be spread by completely healthy people showing no symptoms; that the virus causing it is “novel” and capable of evading immunity; and that it can continually adapt into variants that are increasingly infectious and deadly. Under this narrative, anything and everything becomes “reasonable.” It has been upheld as legal and will continue to be upheld as long as the narrative remains intact.

This is the Great Lie, and it has remained completely unchallenged.

Unchallenged in Canada.
Unchallenged in the United States.
Unchallenged across North America and the entire continent.
Until Now

Challenging the Lie

As many of you know, the City of Toronto and the Province of Ontario came down on Adam Skelly like ten tonnes of bricks. The government brought six separate legal proceedings against him for daring to dissent.

Why? To single him out. To make an example of him. To punish him for simply saying no. Adam was the first person in North America to be arrested for disobeying public health orders. In the age of COVID-19 tyranny and totalitarianism, dissent and debate are no longer permitted.

The government struck. And we struck back. Last year, CCOC helped Adam retain new counsel. We are determined to be heard and we will be heard.

We are challenging the Reopening Ontario Act, its lockdown regulation 82/20, and the authority of Toronto’s Medical Officer of Health on legal and constitutional grounds.
Learn More

Latest News